On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:10:43AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:49:00 +0200 Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 03:44:33PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > Anyway: the documentation seems to state that the option > > > > > > --grid-dash 1:0 > > > > > > will give solid grid lines. > > > > > > As far as the other issue is concerned (number of horizontal grid > > > lines) are you currently using the following option on the new graphs? > > > > > > -Y also known as --alt-y-grid > > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 04:15:19PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > Another option that may be nice to use is > > > > > > --right-axis 1:0 > > > > > > This should produce a second vertical axis on the right of the graph, > > > with scale=1 and shift=0, that is to say an exact copy of the left > > > vertical axis, if I understand correctly. > > > > > > Did you try this option out? > > > It should make the numeric values of bug counts more easy to read on > > > the graph, I think... > > > > Tried to set all of the above on the new graphs on > > http://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs > > They look fairly nice, IMHO. > > I am still wondering why the old graphs (the ones currently on > http://people.debian.org/~glandium/bts ) seem to be still smarter with > respect to the y-axis grid. > > I mean: the old graphs seem to almost always guess optimal y-axis grid > lines and labels, while the new graphs look nice but not optimal...
Would you have examples of such optimal vs. suboptimal graphs ? > Have you tried to remove the "-Y also known as --alt-y-grid" option > and see the default result? The graphs on merkel are without -Y. (http://merkel.debian.org/~glandium/bts/) Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101030072145.ga3...@glandium.org
