On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:53:50PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:19:35 +0100 Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 06:57:17PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > In summary, I think that test-1 could be considered OK, unless we > > > manage to find a way to further enhance the result... > > > > This was long overdue, but the graphs are now officially on > > qa.debian.org, > > Cool! Thanks! > > > I also modified the rrdtool graph command so that missing data don't > > leave white stripes on the graphs (though I wonder if that has an impact > > on packages that no bugs now but had some a few months ago) > > Mmmmh, it seems it has an impact: see for instance > http://packages.qa.debian.org/libd/libdata-dump-streamer-perl.html > which has no bugs currently, but the graph still reports 1 pending bug: > http://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs/libd/libdata-dump-streamer-perl.png
I tried to find one such package but failed. I'll take a look. > Moreover, I noticed that > http://packages.qa.debian.org/liba/libalien-wxwidgets-perl.html > has no graph: > http://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs/liba/libalien-wxwidgets-perl.png That is somehow expected, for packages that never had bugs during the time the data was gathered. That's not new, by the way. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110218181401.ga29...@glandium.org
