> Hi, > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:57:26PM +0200, George Danchev wrote: > > packages with more than 10/100 open bugs (any kind of) > > That is a nonsensical measure. Big packages have many bugs.
Debian archive contains more small packages than large ones, so it makes sense to catch these with many bugs opened, doesn't it? > Many of them are upstream bugs. What difference does it make, they are still bugs. > It doesn't make sense to use a hardcoded value like this. That could be any BigInt or user-defined of course. > > and eventually reports about packages with bugs tagged as 'request for > > help', 'more info' and 'wontfix'. > > True for the last ones. I disagree about wontfix, that will just prompt > people to close them if they get a useless message about that. wontfix could be abused, so it might be interesting to know how popular it is. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
