> On 20/10/09 at 22:15 +0200, George Danchev wrote: > > packages in testing with more than 0/5 open RC-bug > > packages in testing with more than 10/100 open bugs (any kind of) > > > > packages in testing with bugs tagged as 'request for help', 'more info' > > and 'wontfix'. > > The best would be to have some use cases for this data in mind:
Well, the test cases are as following: * identify the group of packages holding up our release (RC>0) * identify the group of packages which could be *eventually* removed, if they are leaf packages with RC>5; if they are not leaf packages and a fair amount of packages depend on them, then we are in real trouble, hence such a trend is best to be prevented in advance if at all possible. The 'request for help' and 'more info' group could be interesting to identify since a broader amount of users (not only reporter and maintainer) could eventually supply the needed data or hopefully a solution if they knew that in the first place. > it's easy to generate data, harder to generate useful data :-) I don't believe that ;-) > See http://wiki.debian.org/UltimateDebianDatabase for information about > how to connect to UDD. Thanks. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
