Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please detect the unconditional use of debconf, adduser, update-inetd, > etc inside "purge" conditional or case, or at the top of a script, > before conditionals or cases.
"etc." is going to be read as if it wasn't present unless someone spells it out for me, I'm afraid. I don't know what is supposed to go into "etc." that is causing problems in practice. If anyone has a specific list of additional programs for which this is a problem, appending them to the lintian bug would be nice. (Bug#398658) > Please also detect this: >> >> . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule || true >> They should really use >> >> f=/usr/share/debconf/confmodule >> [ ! -e $f ] || . $f; Please don't combine multiple issues in a single bug report. (Although you already reported this a while back as Bug#376183.) These and several other requests for lintian (such as Bug#397785) are currently not being worked on largely because lintian does not have good facilities for doing complex analysis of maintainer scripts and most of these requests ideally require a fair amount of state tracking and context awareness to avoid false positives and false negatives. Any suggestions and (ideally) contributions towards solving this would be greatly appreciated. I'm starting to think that in order to do a good job with these sorts of problems, lintian is going to have to acquire at least a minimalist understanding of Bourne shell syntax so that it can do lexical analysis of maintainer scripts. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
