On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 01:27:06AM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote: > Oh, come off it! section 8.7 of the packaging manual says "may" in > reference to build-depends, so not doing so cannot be a bug. Also, to > expect everyone to state a build dependancy on debhelper is > ridiculous! You can't reasonably expect to auto-build packages without > having it available. I'm therefore closing this bug.
Goswin could also explain why he filed reports against potato packages only. This is a strange choice in general IMHO, filing many many bugs like them I mean, and I don't like it, but I would have seen it just a bit more correct if it was related to unstable packages. bye Christian -- Christian Surchi | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] FLUG: http://www.firenze.linux.it | Debian GNU/Linux: http://www.debian.org -----------------> http://www.firenze.linux.it/~csurchi <------------------ "This is lemma 1.1. We start a new chapter so the numbers all go back to one." -- Prof. Seager, C&O 351
