Your message dated Tue, 29 Aug 2000 01:27:06 +0100 (BST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#70196: automatic build fails for potato
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2000 02:24:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 27 21:24:58 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (ngi.de) [::ffff:195.243.0.244]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13TEba-0001rh-00; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 21:24:58 -0500
Received: (qmail 30231 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2000 02:24:41 -0000
Received: from p3e9e1487.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO dual.intern.brederlow.de)
(@62.158.20.135)
by 195.243.0.244 with SMTP; 28 Aug 2000 02:24:41 -0000
Received: from mrvn by dual.intern.brederlow.de with local (Exim 3.12 #1
(Debian))
id 13TMAG-0003cr-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 12:29:16 +0200
From: Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: automatic build fails for potato
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 12:29:16 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: asa
Version: N/A; reported 2000-08-28
Severity: normal
*** explain.txt
I compiled all packages that have no "Build-Depends" in potato/main/Sources.gz.
Your package failed to build together with about 1700 other packages.
Since you have no "Build-Depends" you eigther forgot that your package
build-depends on something (like debhelper?) or you don't know about
build dependencies.
The releavnt fields are descibed in:
http://www.at.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/packaging.html/ch-relationships.html#s8.7
Please add build dependencies to your package or correct what ever else
caused the package not to build. If you already did so for woody, please
just close this bug report. If your Package is one of the rare cases with
a Build-Depends-Indep and I overlooked it, also please just close.
May the Source be with you.
Goswin
The compilation logfiles follows:
*** asa/asa.log
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Need to get 12.5kB of source archives.
Get:1 ftp://alpha potato/main asa 1.2-1.1 (dsc) [548B]
Get:2 ftp://alpha potato/main asa 1.2-1.1 (tar) [10.0kB]
Get:3 ftp://alpha potato/main asa 1.2-1.1 (diff) [1900B]
Fetched 12.5kB in 0s (65.1kB/s)
dpkg-source: extracting asa in asa-1.2
dpkg-source: extracting asa in asa-1.2
shell-init: could not get current directory: getcwd: cannot access parent
directories: No such file or directory
dpkg-source: extracting asa in asa-1.2
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is asa
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.2-1.1
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
debian/rules clean DEB_BUILD_ARCH=i386 DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU=i386
DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM=linux DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE=i386-linux DEB_HOST_ARCH=i386
DEB_HOST_GNU_CPU=i386 DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM=linux DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE=i386-linux
dh_testdir
make: dh_testdir: Command not found
make: *** [clean] Error 127
Build command 'cd asa-1.2 && dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc' failed.
E: Child process failed
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dual 2.2.17 #1 Sun Jun 25 09:24:41 EST 2000 i686
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 70196-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2000 00:27:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 28 19:27:10 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from puce.csi.cam.ac.uk [::ffff:131.111.8.40]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13TZF7-0008Rf-00; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 19:27:10 -0500
Received: from rapun.sel.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.232.108] ident=mail)
by puce.csi.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1)
id 13TZF5-000032-00; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 01:27:07 +0100
Received: from matthew by rapun.sel.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 13TZF4-0004mD-00; Tue, 29 Aug 2000 01:27:06 +0100
From: Matthew Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 01:27:06 +0100 (BST)
To: Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Bug#70196: automatic build fails for potato
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: Matthew Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Goswin Brederlow writes:
> Package: asa
> Version: N/A;
> Severity: normal
> Since you have no "Build-Depends" you eigther forgot that your package
> build-depends on something (like debhelper?) or you don't know about
> build dependencies.
> dh_testdir
> make: dh_testdir: Command not found
Oh, come off it! section 8.7 of the packaging manual says "may" in
reference to build-depends, so not doing so cannot be a bug. Also, to
expect everyone to state a build dependancy on debhelper is
ridiculous! You can't reasonably expect to auto-build packages without
having it available. I'm therefore closing this bug.
I fail to see what this whole process of filing bugs against every
package without a Build-Depends: debhelper is meant to achieve, other
than filling the bts with garbage...
Matthew
Debian QA
--
Rapun.sel - outermost outpost of the Pick Empire
http://www.pick.ucam.org
