Your message dated Wed, 3 Feb 1999 05:50:31 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed.
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 1998 22:33:14 +0000
Received: (qmail 23315 invoked from network); 17 Apr 1998 22:33:14 -0000
Received: from gaul.lattis.xara.net (195.224.37.7)
by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 17 Apr 1998 22:33:14 -0000
Received: by gaul.lattis.xara.net with ESMTP
from sfere.greenend.org.uk (sfere.greenend.org.uk [195.224.38.1])
id XAA02823 (2.4-8.8.8/3.1.23);
Fri, 17 Apr 1998 23:27:30 +0100 (BST)
Received: from valour.greenend.org.uk ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [195.224.38.2])
by sfere.greenend.org.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA19498;
Fri, 17 Apr 1998 22:33:47 +0100
Received: by valour.greenend.org.uk
id m0yQIlX-000w4ZC
(Debian Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #2); Fri, 17 Apr 1998 22:33:47
+0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 22:33:47 +0100 (BST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Austin Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Daniel Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fvwm-common should contain setup-background
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 6.42 under Emacs 19.34.1
Package: fvwm-common
Version: 2.0.46-BETA-2
On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Daniel Martin wrote:
> I'm the new fvwm95 maintainer.
Welcome!
Thanks for taking over from Christoph, he's been too busy to do much
work on the package for a while now.
> What are the chances that I could convince you to move
> setup-background out of fvwm2 and into fvwm-common?
Fairly high - it's probably a good idea. I'll do the change when I
next make a release of fvwm2, since fvwm-common is built out of the
fvwm2 tree. (Actually, maybe it should be split off, but that's a
different story).
You will need to add a "suggests" or a "reccommends" of the
appropriate new version of fvwm-common, of course.
While you're at it, I've been asking Christoph to merge his extra
icons into fvwm-common, since there's quite a bit of overlap. To a
certain extent, this is entwinded with the discussion going on about
where pixmaps and bitmaps should live in the filesystem. Personally,
I would vote for the traditional
/usr/X11R6/include/X11/{bitmap,pixmap} solution, but I suppose if you
buy into the /usr/share/... world view, then somewhere under there
would be best.
> I'd really like to use it in the fvwm95 startup configurations;
> maybe it could be modified to take an optional parameter (which
> would default to fvwm2) so that it would know which ~/.fvwm*
> directory to look in for the background info. I'd really hate to
> re-invent the wheel for fvwm95.
Yes, the extra arg would be necessary.
I'm filing this as a bug report so I don't forget the point.
Austin
