Your message dated Wed, 3 Feb 1999 05:50:31 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed.
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 1998 00:28:12 +0000
Received: (qmail 16148 invoked from network); 9 Feb 1998 00:28:11 -0000
Received: from animx.3wave.com (HELO animx.ml.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 9 Feb 1998 00:28:11 -0000
Received: by animx.ml.org
id m0y1hDJ-00048HC
(Debian Smail-3.2.0.100 1997-Dec-8 #2 Bug? What bug /\oo/\); Sun, 8
Feb 1998 19:36:45 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 1998 19:36:45 -0500 (EST)
From: Wakko Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: fvwm2: Fvwm2 should suggest not recommend menu
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bcc:
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.0
Package: fvwm2
Version: 2.0.46-BETA-2
Severity: wishlist
I don't think that fvwm2 really should recommend menu. I have 2 machines that
fvwm2 is just there for a window manager, nothing else. Very limited on disk
space as well. They don't need it... It would be better to suggest it.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.0 (unstable)
Kernel Version: Linux ani 2.0.33 #1 Wed Dec 17 21:51:33 EST 1997 i586 unknown
Versions of the packages fvwm2 depends on:
libc6 Version: 2.0.6-3
xlib6g Version: 3.3.1-2
xpm4g Version: 3.4j-0.6
