Raul Miller wrote:
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The bug report you sent does not contain a description of the
> > but. Please refer to the bug report and add some description.
> > All you sent in was a program you wrote. It is not commented
> > nor self explanatory. From what I see it mucks around with some
> > symblic names for signals. What do you want the rc mainntainer
> > to do with it?
>
> The debian source documentation for rc mentions some problems determining
> the list of signals -- the linux include file structure isn't quite what
> rc expects but it's not very clean to have to build the list of signals
> by hand. This script was presented as a mechanism to solve that problem.
>
> So the bug should be a wish-list bug, and it doesn't really matter
> to anyone other than the maintainer of the package.
Hmm, so as interim maintainer ai add it to the doc directory,
install it in /usr/doc/rc and forward it upstream.
> [But I seem to recall that someone else took over the package. If
> they want to use another approach, that's fine with me. I only
> wrote that script because I thought it might solve a problem for
> the maintainer.]
Hmm, not that I know of. Currently the package is pretty much
orphaned. I have a fixed version in my queue and will upload
it - including a really orphaning - if you don't want to take
over the pkg or want to work on it but want me to upload the
fix.
Regards,
Joey
--
There are lies, statistics and benchmarks.
