Hi, * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050621 11:26]: > I'm trawling the list of build failures on various architectures, and I'm > finding packages that have never, ever been successfully built on an > autobuilder from day one, in spite of bug reports being filed early and > often, e.g.: nemesi, bug #303075. What should be the policy for requesting > removal of such packages? I think two months is more than enough time for a > maintainer to get their act together before having the package bounced back > out again. Anyone disagree?
Great that you do it :) It is on my list to go through all packages that are not in sarge and have an RC-bug w/o appropriate activity, and compile a list of packages for removal. Of course, one should warn the maintainers appropriate, and perhaps orphan in some cases (and/or do a MIA-check for some other cases). Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
