On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:26:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm trawling the list of build failures on various architectures, and I'm > finding packages that have never, ever been successfully built on an > autobuilder from day one, in spite of bug reports being filed early and > often, e.g.: nemesi, bug #303075. What should be the policy for requesting > removal of such packages? I think two months is more than enough time for a > maintainer to get their act together before having the package bounced back > out again. Anyone disagree? Not much. Could you make it 3 or 4 months for sponsored packages? I can see waiting for an upstream fix for that long, instead of bugging a sponsor to "test" a fix, manually or automatically by uploading. Especially when a release has been imminent for some time now.
What do you mean "bounced back out"? Do you mean removed from testing? That seems fine. Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
