On 01/21/2014 01:25 PM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Le Tue, 21 Jan 2014 13:07:43 +0100, Helge Deller <del...@gmx.de> a
>> The problem is, that the audit package is one of the major
>> packages on which most other packages directly or indirectly depend
>> on. Just look at the graph (magenta line) at 
>> http://buildd.debian-ports.org/stats/ The patch which I proposed
>> here is needed for hppa...
> 
> Isn't this patch only needed for the translation of the syscalls,
> and not the normal operations of the applications linking against
> libaudit?

Yes, that's true.
As long as libaudit compiles it's OK.
The current version (even without my patch) does now compile on hppa.
The last version failed, and that's the reason why I started building that 
patch.
As arch maintainer it's nice if the list of patches gets reduced at some point 
though :-)
Happily we don't have many patches for hppa.

Thanks for your help with libaudit!
Helge


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52de6d32.4070...@gmx.de

Reply via email to