Your message dated Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:49:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Apr 2003 09:20:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 29 04:20:21 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from selenium.one-2-one.net (selenium.webpack.hosteurope.de) 
[217.115.142.122] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 19ARHg-0007JF-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 04:20:20 -0500
Received: from sandbender (pD9E4EA57.dip.t-dialin.net [217.228.234.87])
        (authenticated)
        by selenium.webpack.hosteurope.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id 
h3T9KJ728127
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:20:19 +0200
Received: from robertle by sandbender with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 19ARBx-0000qr-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:14:25 +0200
From: Robert Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: weblint throws error messages -- seems to work all right
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:14:25 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
        version=2.53
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: weblint
Version: 1.93-2
Severity: normal

when using weblint i get tons of error messages like these:
        Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /usr/lib/perl5/Weblint.pm
        line 816.
        Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/lib/perl5/Weblint.pm
        line 816
all in the same line. the output looks reasonable though. tell me if you
need more infos/tests


cu  robert

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux sandbender 2.4.20 #1 Tue Apr 29 10:12:37 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages weblint depends on:
ii  perl [perl5]                  5.6.1-8.2  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 191224-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Aug 2004 18:49:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 30 11:49:46 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1C1rDu-0000Vt-00; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 11:49:46 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id E6B0564D44; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:49:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by unjust.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 84FA23F07B; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:49:33 +0100 (BST)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:49:33 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed from the archive
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

weblint has been removed from  Debian unstable because it had no
maintainer for 1.5 years and because there are better replacements,
such as weblint-perl.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to