Your message dated 09 Aug 2004 00:09:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line upstream missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2003 15:46:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 30 09:46:12 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tk212017118241.teleweb.at [212.17.118.241]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18zf0d-0004S5-00; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 09:46:11 -0600
Received: from ljs by TK212017118241.teleweb.at with local (Exim 3.36 #1
(Debian))
id 18zg2Y-0001un-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 18:52:14 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: elza: New upstream version (1.4.4)
X-Debbugs-CC: Leonard Stiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Leonard Stiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 18:52:14 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Leonard Stiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
X_DEBBUGS_CC
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: elza
Version: 1.4.3-3
Severity: normal
Version 1.4.4 seems to be available from
<URL:http://phiphi.hypermart.net/pub/elza-1.4.4.zip>.
--
Leonard Stiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 186852-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2004 07:09:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 09 00:09:22 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bu4Ha-0006P2-00; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:09:22 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Bu4Ha-0002zE-Da
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:09:22 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: upstream missing
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Tom-Swiftie: "Remember to kill all the child processes," Tom said on signal
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 09 Aug 2004 00:09:22 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 8
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Upstream URL is gone now, and 1.4.4 has nasty things said about it in
various webspace. So this should be closed (alas).
If it is reopened, it should be reassigned priority wishlist, not normal.
Thomas
