Your message dated 09 Aug 2004 00:12:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line accepted by maintainer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2003 04:38:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 11 23:38:23 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hall.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.60]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19xfhM-0007eI-00; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 23:38:20 -0500
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz)
by hall.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 19xfhM-0004ce-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 00:38:20 -0400
Received: from daniel by frobnitz with local (Exim 4.22)
id 19xfhL-0006hu-0O
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:38:19 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: elza: FTBFS: Cannot create symbolic link
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:38:18 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: elza
Version: 1.4.3-3
Severity: serious
>From my build log:
...
dh_installmanpages
# Symlink manpage of elza to elza.pl
ln -s elza.1 debian/elza/usr/share/man/man1/elza.pl.1
ln: creating symbolic link `debian/elza/usr/share/man/man1/elza.pl.1' to
`elza.1': No such file or directory
make: *** [binary-indep] Error 1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.6.0-test4 #1 Thu Aug 28 00:56:57 PDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
--
Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] haven't had breakfast yet."
-- Orson Scott Card
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 210558-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2004 07:12:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 09 00:12:21 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bu4KT-00072E-00; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:12:21 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Bu4KT-0002zr-Aa
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:12:21 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: accepted by maintainer
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Tom-Swiftie: "What's the command syntax in `ed'?" Tom questioned
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 09 Aug 2004 00:12:21 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 5
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
This NMU fix was accepted by maintainer in the first QA upload,
1.4.3-4.
Thomas
