Hi Nilesh
When I saw the list yesterday, it showed dozens and dozens of packages
running tests. In my previous upload where there
was a bug, I saw around 20 or so packages failing.
There's only 5 there, likely because it is bad display or things that
passed do not show up. On that entire page, you
will mostly find packages that are _failing_. It is also not correct (or
even believable) that only 5 packages in the whole archive ever
depend on matplotlib for tests given this is a very popular plotting
library.
So that statement is incorrect.
hmm, ok, I'm very happy to be incorrect on that. I did check the excuses
pages of some other packages and they seemed to show lots of packages
that were passing. That's great news.
I'm still quite confident that we're undertesting though - I saw on the
developer list for src:sasview that it's not compatible with matplotlib
3.10 and yet no flags from any tests are coming up. Like many uses of
matplotlib, it probably doesn't even have tests that actually touch the
failing code.
cheers
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescott http://www.nanonanonano.net/ stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org
GPG fingerprint 90E2 D2C1 AD14 6A1B 7EBB 891D BBC1 7EBB 1396 F2F7
