[Scott Kitterman, 2016-11-29] > Piotr: Is there some language that acknowledges the situation as unusual, > even > if it doesn't fully bless it that you'd be comfortable with in policy so we > can at least document current practice?
if module name is foo, name of the binary package should be python3-foo, not python3-bar-foo. There is no change needed on the upstream side or in django/__init__.py - it's just about naming binary packages the way our policy recommends. Adjusting policy to document good changes we came up in practice is good. Documenting bad ones is not. That said, I don't have a veto vote so I will just have to deal with it. -- Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645
