On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Barry Warsaw <ba...@debian.org> wrote: > On Aug 02, 2014, at 06:23 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >>If someone on the team is interested in this package staying in Debian and >>willing to be added to uploaders, please speak up. I don't mind doing the >>work to modernize the packaging, but don't care to be responsible for it long >>term. > > I personally don't think it's worth spending time on gnupginterface. We have > the PyPI package python-gnupg in the archive and its upstream seems relatively > active. I don't think we have gnupg 1.3.1 (top PyPI hit for "gnupg") and that > has an even more recent PyPI release. I haven't looked at the latter, but I > use the former in several projects, including Python 3 projects.
FWIW, that 1.3.1 version is a fork of original python-gnupg. According to Github repo description [1], it is "a modified version of python-gnupg, including security patches, extensive documentation, and extra features". [1] https://github.com/isislovecruft/python-gnupg -- Dmitry Shachnev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cakimphvmcfaa+pfwh9oaphxtlzjpgdyocvhy+5fluk0lnck...@mail.gmail.com
