On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:11 AM, Mathias Behrle <mathi...@m9s.biz> wrote: > * Jordan Metzmeier: " Re: favouring Python3 in the Debian policy" (Wed, 7 May > 2014 21:55:20 -0500): > > Hello Jordan, > >> The jurko fork was the one I was working with when attempting the port >> to suds. I never made it to testing under python3. > > [...] > >> I consider debbugs to be broken, not suds. > > Thanks for your detailed explanations. > > Could you share, if you have any experiences with orginal suds compared to > suds-furko (or any of the other forks mentionned by Barry)? > > I don't expect http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/suds/trunk to be revived [1] > and > of course it would be preferable to have an actively maintained version of > suds > in Debian. suds-furko seems to be the most appropriate candidate [2]. If no > one > raises his hands or objects, I will try to do some tests and file the ITP. >
My experience was no different than working with the original suds library. It might be better to replace our existing suds library with a fork rather than introduce the fork as a new package. Regards, Jordan Metzmeier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cad758rhvr1yq+gm+5+sxby19oab9eqz5yeus-nphconzp6j...@mail.gmail.com
