I usually include all logs which lead to the state of packaging to be uploaded, regardless of the distribution (or even at times UNRELEASED).
Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 02:04:22PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> I've been working with gtimelog's upstream maintainer Marius, and >with the >> permission of the old gtimelog Debian maintainers, have added it to >PAPT. >> Please note that gtimelog was removed from Debian a while ago, but >remained in >> Ubuntu, and now the plan is to add the latest upstream version back >to >> Debian. I've put myself as Maintainer and PAPT as uploaders. >> >> Here's my question though: the d/changelog in PAPT svn has a bunch of >entries >> from the times it was updated in Ubuntu ahead of Debian. There's >useful >> information in there, but I'm wondering if I should trim d/changelog >to just >> the changes that occurred in Debian. E.g. dropping everything >between >> 0.0+svn88-3 (last squeeze version) to 0.9.1-1 which will be the new >upload. >> OTOH, I suppose it doesn't hurt that much to keep all the Ubuntu >changelog >> entries in the file. >> >> Anybody have strong opinions either way? > >In the past, I've treated them as "NMUs" to the package, and just >included it in the changelog. There's no real harm in my mind, at >least. > >I've even written "Acknowledge Ubuntu uploads" almost like ack'ing >NMUs. > >My 2c, > Paul > > >-- >:wq -- Sent from a phone which beats iPhone.
