On 07/08/2013 10:10 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > There is no policy on this either way, so there's no "mistake".
Well, the mistake is precisely to have no rule, IMO. On 07/08/2013 11:37 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > Hopefully, it will become more and more common to have at least > python-X and python3-X. With that in mind, many of our source > packages that are producing a single binary package today should > hopefully be producing two or more binary packages tomorrow. Never the less, I think we should collectively decide what to do, rather than continuing the mess, with everyone having its own rule. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
