Another rule of thumb I use is that if a project is not just about python module but also provides some GUI or CUI interface which might be used by users without realizing presence of a python behind I do not prefix with python-, eg psychopy.
Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> wrote: >On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> >wrote: >> There is no policy on this either way, so there's no "mistake". >Personally, I >> tend to use the upstream name for the source package name and >> python-$modulename (per Python policy) for the binary. > >I'm using the same same rule, with just one exception: I'm calling >source package python-X if X is too generic (see python-psutil, where >upstream is calling the project psutil, too close to psutils). I don't >feel there's anything to "fix" here, or to write a policy for source >package name. > >Regards, >-- >Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) >My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ >Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- Sent from a phone which beats iPhone. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/89e4a6bb-fc21-4c30-a1d7-b08808406...@email.android.com
