On Thursday, February 21, 2013 01:57:11 PM Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 02/21/2013 12:32 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > On Feb 20, 2013, at 11:02 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> It is to a degree, but the learning curve for git is subtantially steeper > >> than for other VCS. I've learned CVS, SVN, BZR, and Git at one time or > >> another and there is no question in my mind which one, by a lot, is the > >> most complex to learn. > > > > No one's accusing git of actually being user friendly. <wink> > > > > http://steveko.wordpress.com/2012/02/24/10-things-i-hate-about-git/ > > > > -Barry > > Some of the points in this page are really wrong. > Like in the point 6, 7, 8 and 9, the author didn't understand > at all the necessity of having fast-forward history when > a project scales up, with lots of contributors. > > Then finally, I agree, the only thing that remains is the > complexity. :)
If by scales up, you mean the Linux kernel, sure. I agree, but for something the complexity of DPMT/PAPT where there don't tend to be lots of committers on the same package, they are valid. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1800697.fkr4dhOjoz@scott-latitude-e6320
