On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 01:33:45PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Mar 06, 2011, at 05:43 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > >Do the 2 VCDs you mentioned have clear advantage that make then > >preferible to git except being Python-based? If so, I think it's a > >quite weak reason. > > Let me turn that around: why would you *not* want to use a Python based dVCS? > <wink>
I think Debian package maintainer tool support should be considered.
> One reason could be that git is the de-facto standard for Debian. I guess
> choice of dVCS is the editor-wars of the 2010s, and probably just as silly.
Is there a mature git-buildpackage replacement for mercurial or bazaar?
There is a mercurial-buildpackage but I don't know how feature complete/
comparable to git-buildpackage or svn-buildpackage it is.
How well does debcommit work with mercurial or bazaar?
Regards
Jan
--
Jan Dittberner - Debian Developer
GPG-key: 4096R/558FB8DD 2009-05-10
B2FF 1D95 CE8F 7A22 DF4C F09B A73E 0055 558F B8DD
http://www.dittberner.info/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
