Hi, On Sun, 06.03.2011 at 16:01:04 -0500, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote: > With bzr the transition from svn is a little easier than that. Almost any > svn > command you would use, the same command works with bzr, e.g. svn co and bzr > co.
I can confirm that bzr-svn works much more smoothly than git-svn, but that's about it, in terms of advantages, as far as I'm concerned. > Since we're using svn, I don't think cvs clients are particulalry relevant. I should try to run git-svn against the repo... let's see what happens. > I find bzr to be very reliable in the projects I use it on (where people are > using Debian, Ubuntu and some *bsd variants). It also seems it's learning > curve is less steep than git's. I can mostly agree to that, but eg. branching is *MUCH* more of a hassle and, so far, merging also appears to be much more difficult to me. Kind regards, --Toni++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
