On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:44:36AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Wednesday, June 23, 2010 11:08:47 pm Paul Wise wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> > wrote: > > > The email is meant to go to the release team to address what I understand > > > to be release team specific requirement. I think that the broader > > > question needs to be discussed in a broader audience.
> > I think it is relevant there as well, IIRC folks from the then release > > team were behind the move from python2.X-foo to python-foo modules. > OK. I'll include them in that discussion, although I think what we are > proposing now is entirely unrelated to that decision. As one of the aforementioned release team members, I agree. When module compatibility between python2.x and python3.x is not the common case, I don't think the arguments for consolidating on python-foo apply here. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
