On Wednesday, June 23, 2010 10:01:03 pm Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> wrote: > > In Debian Python we are currently discussing how best to specify version > > information for Python 3. There is a strong (but not unanimous) view > > among the participants in debian-pyt...@l.d.o and #debian-python that > > Python(2) and Python 3 are sufficiently different that they should be > > treated as essentially separate run time systems. If a package > > expresses support for Python versions greater than (for example) 2.4, > > this should never include any Python 3 versions. > > Your mail doesn't seem to mention the planned python-foo/python3-foo > duplication for modules that are portable to both versions of python.
The email is meant to go to the release team to address what I understand to be release team specific requirement. I think that the broader question needs to be discussed in a broader audience. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201006232242.41734.deb...@kitterman.com
