Felix Lechner <felix.lech...@lease-up.com> writes: > Your statement is the opposite of what I felt. In fact, I asked for the > circumstances to be published on debian-private. It was calming to me, > so your interpretation is not correct.
Thank you for the correction! I'm sorry for having misunderstood you. You'd made other statements about how you received that warning that I have apparently misinterpreted. > Finally to my original point, I believe that your conclusions contradict > mine so frequently because you overlaid your opinion onto mine, i.e > projected your perception onto mine. It's certainly possible. I find it very difficult to understand where you're coming from, and the only way I have of understanding other people is through empathy, so I do continue to try to map your reactions to a model that I can understand in order to try to understand your point. Regardless, my intent in this conversation is not to talk about your warning specifically. That was something you brought up in this discussion, and I don't feel like this is the place to talk about it nor is it something I want to dig into. I'm trying to make a general point about the impact of the current process, which I think still applies even if it wasn't relevant in your specific case. It sounds like you may disagree with my opinion about the process. Great! That's part of the discussion. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
