Re: Questions around Justice and Our Current CoC procedures

[Scott Kitterman]

On February 21, 2022 12:56:43 PM UTC, Jonathan Carter <j...@debian.org> wrote:
>On 2022/02/21 14:40, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> I didn't intend to communicate that it was a final step.  I think we agree.  
>> A DAM warning, as you said, indicates someone is on a path to suspension or 
>> expulsion.  I don't have a problem with this.  What bothers me is trying to 
>> pretend it's something less that's not a big deal.
>
>By that logic becoming a DD is a potential step in getting suspended or 
>expelled. It's not the warning that gets people kicked out, it's the 
>continued poor behaviour. If a person takes their DAM warning (and 
>likely at that point requests from other DDs) seriously, then it doesn't 
>have to become a big deal.

No.

It sounds to me like you are claiming that there's no change in the threshold 
for being removed due to the previous warning(s) and that's just not true.

Scott K