On 4/19/21 5:58 AM, Olek Wojnar wrote: > Hi zigo, > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 6:16 PM Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org > <mailto:z...@debian.org>> wrote: > > > I'd be very much for leaving the decision of open/close to our > secretary, with most votes open, and the possibility for him to decide > when it should be closed. I trust Kurt to do the right thing whenever a > vote (like the RMS GR) needs to be closed. Otherwise, I very much prefer > if most votes were staying open. > > > Note that the RMS GR was, in fact, open. :) > > I respect Kurt's interpretation of the constitution and the reluctance > to single-handedly interpret vague sections. I personally believe that > "lists all the votes cast" (4.2.3) should be interpreted to mean "lists > by hash" or another non-personally-identifying means. Perhaps that will > need to be clarified in the constitution, one way or the other, in the > future. My point is that Kurt's interpretation (as I understand it) is > that all non-DPL votes are open. So I don't believe that Kurt would ever > make the decision to have a confidential non-DPL vote. Kurt: please > correct me if I misunderstand you! > > -Olek
Yes, I agree with you. Thought my proposal was to change that fact (ie: change the constitution) so we can give more power to Kurt. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
