* Adrian Bunk [2021-04-13 19:08:14]:
What improvements do you have in mind?
I would like to implement a cryptographic protocol that provides the same level of verifiability for secret votes as the currently used public votes. In particular, I would like to see some additional proof that the published hash values actually belong to eligible voters.
Will you be the person who implements them?
I would like to be a part of that, but as have no experience with the way that Devotee is currently set up, I can only discourage you from letting me anywhere near it without supervision.
Has this been discussed with the Project Secretary?
No, mostly because I am acutely aware that crytography is hard and I really would prefer to see some serious feedback first that I'm not making a fool of myself. I've put my initial draft on Salsa now: https://salsa.debian.org/-/snippets/540 Cheers Timo -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ │ Timo Röhling │ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1 23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │ ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ ╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
