On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:41:52AM +0200, Timo Röhling wrote: >... > Also, I want to clarify that > the current protocol with hash pseudonyms for secret voting in DPL elections > is not in the Constitution either >...
4.2.6 Votes are cast by email in a manner suitable to the Secretary. > If you still think that a DEP is not the appropriate place for this, > I'll gladly put it elsewhere (I would be grateful for suggestions, > though). It would sound like a good idea to me that a GR to change the constitution to make all votes secret should also add language like "in a verifiable way". Regarding technical details: What improvements do you have in mind? Will you be the person who implements them? Has this been discussed with the Project Secretary? > Cheers > Timo cu Adrian
