On 2020-04-14 15:49, Neil McGovern wrote: > If you're using the stable branch of Discourse, then the API is stable > :)
Ha! ;-) This leads a little bit off-topic here, maybe it's better off-list, on #956705, or elsewhere: Can I expect API stability cycles of Discourse long enough, that it were practical to have a client (library) in stable? I'm not talking about one site running on nightlies, but something serious, e.g. the Gnome instance. > The documentation is at > docs.discourse.org. Nothing shown by default, but when I unblock CDNs, there is a long "Loading...", then "A script on this page may be busy, or it may have stopped responding", but finally a download link: https://docs.discourse.org/swagger.json In which I read: > Note: This documentation is not complete, so for missing parts > you may have to\n[reverse engineer the Discourse API](https:// > meta.discourse.org/t/how-to-reverse-engineer-the-discourse-api > /20576) to figure out how to use an API endpoint. My fear is, that an un(der)documented API might also not be long-term stable, even if such a disclaimer is not present.