Hi, > Norbert, I'm very annoyed by your wording. "Having an agenda" reads like > if I was writing out of malice, on purpose, just to annoy you. That is
No, having an agenda is that you have a clear target which you want to achieve. > Reality is that you have no such opinion, you are just (rightly) pissed > by the recent event around your account being revoked, then reinstalled. > Also, this has to do with the foo-guest -> foo (and the other way around > in your case), which needs to be fixed anyways. So this is IMO not > relevant at all here. Wrong. I simply realized that a system that is managed by a few personals with rather free reign on what to do is not where I want to work. You say github is nonfree, but removing rights on gh is practically impossible, I don't know whether it actually happened. I don't care for the nuclear case that MS decides to shut down gh from one day to the next. The same can happen due to other reasons with salsa, too - and we have seen this just last months. That is not the problem, git has everything I care for, so I can just push somewhere else. I care more for arbitrary actions. And I don't want to say that the removal of my access was an arbitrary action, but I want to say that arbitrary actions are just too easy to happen on salsa with a small management team, personal preferences and ideals. So simply put, I don't trust that in future something similar might not happen out of different and even more strange reasons, while I am quite sure that on GH this will *not* happen. And I consider this more likely than the nuclear action of GH closing down. So please, don't assume anthing about what I think and read my intentions. Thanks. Norbert -- PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Dev GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
