Tollef Fog Heen writes ("Re: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers"):
> > Philip Hands writes ("Re: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers"):
> > I think the maintainer saw the writing on the wall, so I count this as
> > a successful intervention by the TC. (I hope the new maintainers will
> > prove me right.) That there wasn't a formal vote is beside the point.
>
> I don't consider this case particularly successful. Regardless of what
> one thinks of the outcome, the process was subpar and had people sniping
> at each other. I don't think that's how the process ought to look.
Sorry, I evidently failed to be clear enough. I agree that the
process was bad. That means that the part of the outcome which is
`how to people feel now' is not good.
The context of my remarks above is precisely Phil's question:
I wonder which column on your tally sheet you will put this
outcome.
I meant just that the TC's power was used to depose an obstructive
maintainer. So this goes in the `TC did intervene' column of Phil's
supposed tally sheet.
> > I still (perhaps, even more so) believe we need to have a better way
> > of dealing with these kind of disputes.
>
> That I agree with.
We have seen a lot of disagreement here on -project about what shape
such a thing should be. Do you have any bright ideas ?
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
