Le Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 03:00:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : > > Dear TC, you have my support, and please feel empowered to require high > standards from the confronting parties that ask for your decisions, so that > your task is made easier, for everybody' good. > > - The TC members should not be asked to read through long threads [...] > - Of course, since this requires significant involvement from both parties, > [...] > - With this guarantee, I think that it would be fair if the TC would give > deadlines [...] > - Similarly, if some TC members do not have time to get deeply involved [...] > - To keep the discussion in clear boundaries, [...] > - In general, do not hesitate to be severe with those who play the clock. > - Also, I think that the main expectation about the TC is that it will > resolve conflicts [...]
Sorry, I forgot one suggestion: - I think that it would be totally fair if the TC, based on its task list and based on the urgency of the questions that are raised, would sometimes decide upfront to leave one case untouched for some weeks or even a copuple of months, to avoid dispersing its attention on too many problems. As long as the decision is not re-postponed, I think that it can be in everybody's best interest. I hope that my comments will not be taken as a lecture on how being better efficient. The message is rather that if you already thought about following that kind of way, don't worry and go for it ! Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
