Jose Luis Rivas <[email protected]> > On 02/17/2012 06:11 PM, MJ Ray wrote: > > http://people.debian.org/~mjr/legal/fsf-osi-list-diff.txt > > shows the ones where OSI and FSF disagree, but what's the > > point of knowing which are involved? Basically, OSI has > > aided proliferation. > > > The point of my question is to give _context_. Which of the list are > non-free and as a consequence wouldn't get software into main Debian's > repositories. So are the ones that in an hypothetical Debian membership > to OSI would need to be changed so that membership gets effective.
The Apple one is the only example I have found in non-free, but there may be others on OSI's list which wouldn't get in: the debian project (and especially debian-legal and even more so the few lawyers to which debian sometimes refers) have limited resources and doesn't go around pre-approving licences before there's anything worth including under it. Hope that explains, -- MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. http://koha-community.org supporter, web and library systems developer. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire (including development) at http://www.software.coop/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
