-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08-04-2009 08:23, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Wed, 08 Apr 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote: > >> + Bernd Zeimetz (Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:18:33 +0200): >> >>> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >>>> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: >>>>> Wouldn't it be just better to point those domains to the respective >>>>> project-wide efforts? I'd appreciate opinions on the matter. >>>> AOL. >>>> Looks like the rule is quite simple too: for any $X.debian.org, >>>> $X.debian.net should point to $X.debian.org. (A reasonable exception >>>> could be www.debian.net containing a list of .debian.net names.) >>> Implementing this rule would be very appreciated. >> Adding DSA to the loop to see if this is something they want to >> standardize or regulate. > > That single rule doesn't scale, there are non-abusive users of clashes > right now (buildd, www), and it wouldn't solve the backports thing.
That means we should try to push the changes in a similar way we adopt Policy changes, by convincing people or that we should try to write the rules and publish them (like DMUP) or vote them (via GR)? :-) I'm just wondering if we should discuss more about the rules or if DSA will propose rules for adoption with some "migration period". Kind regards, - -- Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) "Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknc6DQACgkQCjAO0JDlyka+1QCffcRNvKP+r6+G138YzwnlmVRO hVoAoKensIh6cIjJ1S6UzxNcOOSDHViA =dEh7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
