On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Paul Wise [Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:35:44 +0900]: > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Peter Pentchev <r...@ringlet.net> wrote: > > > (And yes, I know about backports.d.n; maybe I'll get 'round to submitting > > > or maintaining stuff there at some point, but for the present it is > > > a bit easier for me to keep it all in a single repo :) > > > I think you mean backports.org, backports.debian.net is not what you > > think it is. Despite its name, backports.d.n is a personal backports > > archive for Daniel Bauman. > > I really don’t get why it’s appropriate for a developer to use such > generic names for their personal stuff. git.debian.net seems to be > Daniel’s too. > > Wouldn’t it be just better to point those domains to the respective > project-wide efforts? I’d appreciate opinions on the matter.
I'd go a little further and instate a general rule such as: - All subdomains of debian.org should exist in debian.net and point to the same location. - All domains external to debian.org but providing official support should also be accessible from a subdomain of debian.org. - All external domains providing unofficial support should also be accessible from a subdomain of debian.net. That would also be the occasion to discuss about the status of backports, buildd.net and others. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
