>> Therefore the Debian project resolves that >> a) The constitution gets changed to not require K developers to sponsor >> a resolution, but floor(2Q). [see §4.2(1)] >> b) Delaying a decision of a Delegate or the DPL [§4.2(2.2)], >> as well as resolutions against a shortening of discussion/voting >> period or to overwrite a TC decision [§4.2(2.3)] requires floor(Q) >> developers to sponsor the resolution. >> c) the definition of K gets erased from the constitution. [§4.2(7)] > Thanks for bringing this up. I feel that 2Q is possibly too large > however. I'd suggest:
> Therefore the Debian project resolves that: > a) Section 4.2 of the Debian Constitution is amended, replacing all > references to K with Q. > b) 4.2.7 is reworded to state: > Q is half of the square root of the number of current Developers. > Q need not be an integer and is not rounded. Interesting, that makes it harder to stop a delegate as compared to my proposal. Not that thats bad. :) > Reasoning: > a) Q people should be enough to start a GR. The use of the "override a > delegate's decision immediately" is something that should not be > taken lightly. This should still require 2Q. Ok. Fine. > b) No more reference to K, tidy up. Keep the non-rounded float nature > of Q. Hm. Fine. So, those that spoke up yet mostly think Q instead of 2Q for normal GRs. Could change my text, its at least 3 times the size as of now, yes. Or we have 2 vote options, one for 2Q, one for Q. What makes more sense? Guess changing mine, to avoid confusion/too many options?! (All just dreaming ahead to a possible vote :) ) -- bye, Joerg * libpng2 no libpng3 no why ? because no yes no yes no yes bullshit no yes no yes no yes stop ? no when someday beep beep beep beep (Closes: #157011) -- Christian Marillat <maril...@debian.org> Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:41:58 +0200 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
