On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 02:07:16AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > The idea for contributor.d.o includes either to reserve all existing > debian.org UIDs within the @contributor.d.o namespace or activate > them as forwarding or giving people the choice to activate or > whatever.
What about the other direction? Would [EMAIL PROTECTED] reserved as [EMAIL PROTECTED] If so it will be in fact a single namespace (due to isomorphism), if not @contributor.d.o might be requested to change nick while gaining access to @debian.org, which is not that nice, and I don't think we should be that worried to loose @debian.org entries. > > As a consequence of that reasoning, why not giving plain @debian.org > > mail addresses to voting contributors? > Well, different weight. To be able to clearly seperate (using the terms > of my much-discussed text) "is a DC/DM" and "is a DME/DD". Basically > the look to the outside (press, users, etc), if a DC/DM writes something > it is less binding to the project than if a DME/DD writes something. > IMO. Yes, surely it is a matter of weight. But I see a continuous with our current situation and the proposals you have been pushing for. For instance do we have different mail domains for DDs with different access rights (leader, DAM, CTTE, ...)? We don't, we just happen to have the rule that everybody with upload rights has the right to have its own @debian.org address. As a rule it seems quite arbitrary, doesn't it? The most natural alternative IMO is then creating a big bucket containing everybody that the Debian project has identified as identifier contributors which share its principles. Hence, @debian.org for Debian Contributors "and up". Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 [EMAIL PROTECTED],pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'รจ sempre /oo\ All one has to do is hit the right uno zaino -- A.Bergonzoni \__/ keys at the right time -- J.S.Bach
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
