>> Why not @people.debian.org ? It represents pretty good what thoses >> eventual "contributors" would: the _people_ who make Debian. > In fact, I've already argued in this thread that @whatever.debian.org > will need nevertheless to share the namespace with @debian.org > domain. (I.e., I don't want someone to steal "my" > [EMAIL PROTECTED], nor a contributor probably won't to > change nickname if he eventually becomes full blown DD.)
The idea for contributor.d.o includes either to reserve all existing debian.org UIDs within the @contributor.d.o namespace or activate them as forwarding or giving people the choice to activate or whatever. > As a consequence of that reasoning, why not giving plain @debian.org > mail addresses to voting contributors? Well, different weight. To be able to clearly seperate (using the terms of my much-discussed text) "is a DC/DM" and "is a DME/DD". Basically the look to the outside (press, users, etc), if a DC/DM writes something it is less binding to the project than if a DME/DD writes something. IMO. -- bye, Joerg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Windows ME? Mit 13? Kann der nicht lieber Drogen nehmen wie andere Kinder in dem Alter? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
