Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > the tech ctte seems to have people use regular email address and > discusses things in public, will the soc-ctte be different? My > idea you say is bad because it follows something like the tech-ctte in > this regard, as I see it, which is the basis for the soc-ctte, so far. > Is that accurate?
The issues the ctte discusses are technical and reflect the person's technical decisions. The issues are mostly "should maintainer A do X or Y". The issues a social committee would discuss are social and reflect a person's social skills. The issues would be "should we take some action on maintainer A for doing X." I find these two areas very different. YMMV, of course. Granted, now that I've thought about it, you could always say that a public mailing list would be the same thing as a BTS pseudo package. Is having a repository of people having at one point of their life poor social skills as defined by the Debian project a good thing? -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer * -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
