<quote who="Don Armstrong" date="Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 01:50:50PM -0700"> > As a final note, the templates are just that, templates. An AM is > relatively free to tailor the process to the job that the applicant is > actually performing. This is a bit more time consuming for the AM, but > it's ideal for applicants who are involved in non-traditional roles in > Debian.
AMs, the DAM and other people in the project are more hesitant to grant developership to people with non-standard forms of contributions. Sometimes, it's simply harder to test for these because there aren't templates or even qualified AMs! Documentation is relatively common. i18n is a little trickier. I asked around about developership for Debian's lawyer and was told by everyone that it seemed problematic. Don: You were extremely active in Debian-Legal before becoming a developer. Were you tested or evaluated on those contributions? If not, why not? Regards, Mako -- Benjamin Mako Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mako.cc/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
