On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 02:42:54PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote: > We _do_ plan to be LSB compliant eventually. We are, in general, very > strong believers in open standards. But the LSB is not our top > priority at the moment, because it's not something our users are > demanding.
``From my vantage point (as both business person and technologist) the LSB standards are important as moving between vendors is that much less painful. It's one of the reasons I went with Red Hat among distros - although now, for other reasons, I would like to move to Debian.'' Isn't this whole thread about our users demanding it? Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
pgp69afNg3EKn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
