On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 04:43:45PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Asad Quraishi wrote:
> As Roland said, Debian sid (unstable) should be compliant, maybe testing > as well. To be fair, the description for the lsb package in unstable says: "The intent of this package is to provide a best current practice way of installing and running LSB packages on Debian GNU/Linux. Its presence does not imply that we believe that Debian fully complies with the Linux Standard Base, and should not be construed as a statement that Debian is LSB-compliant." And, in fact, last I checked, we were FHS-compatible, but not fully FHS-compliant (we need to finish getting rid of /usr/doc), and since the LSB includes the FHS, that may well mean that we're not strictly LSB-compliant either. We might be LSB-compatible though (if the LSB defines such a category). The appropriate person to ask for more details might be the maintainer of the lsb package. -- Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra- osis is too long [EMAIL PROTECTED] | microscopicsilico- to fit into a single or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | volcaniconi- standalone haiku
