--- Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FYI, debian-testing is NOT for developers.
Hmm... If that is true then perhaps it would be a good idea to update some part of the following to be more accurate, correct, or informative. http://lists.debian.org/devel.html "This is an index of mailing list archives for the following category: Developers" debian-testing: Testing Debian > This list was created for the testing group started during the release of > 1.3. Most of the members at that time were Debian users, and not > developers. The whole point was to get users involved in testing. > Developers said they were already testing on their own. > > The testing group has hit some hard times in the last few years, and has > not been as active as possible for various reasons. You mentioned 1.3. But I'm unclear on this: What is debian-testing's purpose today? > If you want to make a push for more users to get involved in the effort, I > support that very strongly. If you want to coopt this list for some other > noise reduction issues, please look elsewhere. I'm not interested in coopting this list. I'm interested in getting a list available for discussion of the issues of _using_ the software in the system currently known as Woody/testing (and perhaps also including the software in Sid/unstable (Which might mean the name for the list should be something like: debian-Woody/Sid-user or debian-testing/unstable-user Or, perhaps there should be _another_ new list devoted just to discussing _using_ the software that is in Sid/unstable. But, perhaps a single list for discussing using Woody/Sid testing/unstable is better/sufficient? ). ) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com
