-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Peter Vandenabeele wrote: | On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 06:35:49PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: | |>I dislike the "nearest big city" idea, though. I live and |>work in an area with a small city nearby and then four bigger |>cities surrounding me. Most of my work comes from the nearest |>and furthest of those cities. Grouping by English region or |>county also splits me from them, but customers seem to check |>neighbouring areas. I'm not sure why they only check one city |>listing, but that's what seems to happen, as far as I can tell. | | | I would also have problems with appointing the "best" city for | a commercial match. For us (in Belgium), Belgium (the country) | would be a far better match than any city (and why not use | "state"or US based business ?).
In practice it won't be used if not necessary (there are not much consultants listed in Belgium).
| So my suggestion is to replace "close big city" with | "description of your region" (and than everyone can choose | if that is "Ottawa" or "Northern California" or "Leuven" | or "Europe").
Normally it should be possible to find the region when you know the 'close big city', nothing prevents someone to mention more than one 'close big city'.
Cheers
Luk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB7BMk5UTeB5t8Mo0RAgj6AJoCYQo/bo07H9dCedtc316mAh5qJACgw1eS kRClepYd76h/WzYE7jb/ylY= =fW8Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
