debian-project  

Messages by Date

• 2002/11/27 A Token of Thanks for the Season's Greetings sales
• 2002/11/27 Re: Debian as a social group and how to develop it better Andreas Schuldei
• 2002/11/27 想获得永久免费的 @dengke.net 信箱吗？ 安徽soho网
• 2002/11/26 Re:从网上查询到贵公司的信息 高先生
• 2002/11/26 Debian as a social group and how to develop it better Andreas Schuldei
• 2002/11/26 unsubscribe zilvinas
• 2002/11/26 Re: Bug#169533: reportbug vs. ^z suspend and spurious message Rich Rudnick
• 2002/11/25 debconf2 tapes Scott Dier
• 2002/11/25 Re: Bug#169533: reportbug vs. ^z suspend and spurious message Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2002/11/25 debian-project@lists.debian.org Webmasters
• 2002/11/24 Re: Bug#169533: reportbug vs. ^z suspend and spurious message Branden Robinson
• 2002/11/24 Re: Bug#169533: reportbug vs. ^z suspend and spurious message Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2002/11/24 Carreira com Internet D.King
• 2002/11/23 ms windows O.B.Gilmour
• 2002/11/23 Re: Install Party Raphael Hertzog
• 2002/11/22 Help or information requested! Image Products
• 2002/11/22 Re: packages version. Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
• 2002/11/22 packages version. Mauro
• 2002/11/22 Install Party Stéphane CATTET
• 2002/11/22 Dependancies errors ? Francois Chenais
• 2002/11/20 Re: Unidentified subject! Oliver Elphick
• 2002/11/20 Unidentified subject! steve anthony
• 2002/11/20 Re: security.debian.org down, mirror needed John Goerzen
• 2002/11/20 Re: security.debian.org down, mirror needed Anthony Towns
• 2002/11/20 Re: security.debian.org down, mirror needed John Goerzen
• 2002/11/20 Re: security.debian.org down, mirror needed Wichert Akkerman
• 2002/11/20 security.debian.org down, mirror needed Richard van den Berg
• 2002/11/19 Re: Bug#169533: reportbug vs. ^z suspend and spurious message Branden Robinson
• 2002/11/19 Sillas Ergonómicas Erasmo
• 2002/11/19 Re: Bug#169533: reportbug vs. ^z suspend and spurious message Chris Lawrence
• 2002/11/17 Please Confirm Your Subscription to AUTHENTICS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
• 2002/11/17 music dave
• 2002/11/16 NEC VR5000 Geoff Baker
• 2002/11/16 Re: windowsxp&P4 Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
• 2002/11/15 windowsxp&P4 Ryan Couture
• 2002/11/15 Have fun! 3 Days for free! or only 29 for one month! every day 24 hours! hotstuff
• 2002/11/15 Re: Word Processing Dmitry Borodaenko
• 2002/11/14 Processed: Re: Looking at the 3 year olds Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/11/14 未承諾広告※☆携帯メルマガ広 告がなんと1通1円 ！☆ pakupaku
• 2002/11/14 Re: Word Processing Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
• 2002/11/13 Word Processing Don & Brenda Arnold
• 2002/11/13 wvdial_1.53.0.1.tar.gz ? Cyberthor
• 2002/11/13 Fw: Re: Use of your logo... Rune Eriksson
• 2002/11/12 Re: On RCness and the use of the BTS, etc Ian Jackson
• 2002/11/12 Re: Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile? Ian Jackson
• 2002/11/12 Processed: not us dammit Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/11/12 Re: qt3 Bas Zoetekouw
• 2002/11/12 qt3 zbynek urban
• 2002/11/12 Re: On RCness and the use of the BTS, etc Branden Robinson
• 2002/11/11 On RCness and the use of the BTS, etc Anthony Towns
• 2002/11/11 Re: Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile? Colin Watson
• 2002/11/11 Re: Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile? Adam Heath
• 2002/11/11 Re: Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile? Branden Robinson
• 2002/11/11 Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile? Anthony Towns
• 2002/11/11 Processed: Re: Bug#97671: xutils: why is rstart.real a conffile? Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/11/11 Re: debian advocacy suggestions, anyone? Josip Rodin
• 2002/11/11 Re: debian advocacy suggestions, anyone? Robert Lemmen
• 2002/11/11 Re: debian advocacy suggestions, anyone? Robert Lemmen
• 2002/11/10 World Higher Ed: Gender Balanced True Govt(s) Outgrowing Mostly-Monogendermt(s) Higher Ed on True Government(s)
• 2002/11/10 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Duncan Findlay
• 2002/11/10 Re: A different approach to a conflict resolution document Ian Jackson
• 2002/11/10 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Ian Jackson
• 2002/11/10 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #5 Ian Jackson
• 2002/11/10 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Ian Jackson
• 2002/11/10 unsubscribe Harald K .
• 2002/11/10 Re: debian advocacy suggestions, anyone? Martin Schulze
• 2002/11/10 Re: debian advocacy suggestions, anyone? Martin Schulze
• 2002/11/10 Re: A different approach to a conflict resolution document Oohara Yuuma
• 2002/11/09 Re: Migration of non-free packages to testing Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/09 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Branden Robinson
• 2002/11/09 Re: debianHELP.org announcing commercial software? Ben Collins
• 2002/11/09 Re: debianHELP.org announcing commercial software? Randy Edwards
• 2002/11/09 CREATINE PURE no limite performance [EMAIL PROTECTED]
• 2002/11/09 Re: All vi and clone to be removed from unstable martin f krafft
• 2002/11/09 Processed: Re: Bug#168394: project: translationbug in German tin-options Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/11/09 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Matthew Vernon
• 2002/11/08 Re: All vi and clone to be removed from unstable Anthony Towns
• 2002/11/08 Re: All vi and clone to be removed from unstable Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/08 Re: All vi and clone to be removed from unstable Anthony Towns
• 2002/11/08 Bug#168394: project: translationbug in German tin-options Torsten
• 2002/11/08 Re: All vi and clone to be removed from unstable Gustavo Noronha Silva
• 2002/11/07 Access restricted:Verify your account information. Aw-Verify
• 2002/11/07 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Branden Robinson
• 2002/11/07 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Josip Rodin
• 2002/11/07 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Colin Watson
• 2002/11/07 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Colin Watson
• 2002/11/07 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Martin Schulze
• 2002/11/07 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Oohara Yuuma
• 2002/11/07 Re: debian advocacy suggestions, anyone? Peter Karlsson
• 2002/11/07 Re: debian advocacy suggestions, anyone? Bas Zoetekouw
• 2002/11/07 debian advocacy suggestions, anyone? Robert Lemmen
• 2002/11/07 Processed: reassign 168122 to alsa-xmms Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2002/11/07 Re: All vi and clone to be removed from unstable Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/07 diff between Ian Jackson's Disputes Draft 4 and Draft 5 Branden Robinson
• 2002/11/07 Re: All vi and clone to be removed from unstable Branden Robinson
• 2002/11/07 Re: All vi and clone to be removed from unstable Anthony Towns
• 2002/11/07 Re: All vi and clone to be removed from unstable Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/06 Re: All vi and clone to be removed from unstable Anthony Towns
• 2002/11/06 Re: A different approach to a conflict resolution document Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/06 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #5 Duncan Findlay
• 2002/11/06 Disputes between developers - content, draft #5 Ian Jackson
• 2002/11/06 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Ian Jackson
• 2002/11/06 A different approach to a conflict resolution document Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/06 Re: All vi and clone to be removed from unstable Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/06 Re: All vi and clone to be removed from unstable Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/06 Re: All vi and clone to be removed from unstable Anthony Towns
• 2002/11/06 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/06 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/06 Re: All vi and clone to be removed from unstable Duncan Findlay
• 2002/11/06 Re: All vi and clone to be removed from unstable Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/06 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/06 Re: All vi and clone to be removed from unstable Anthony Towns
• 2002/11/06 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Anthony Towns
• 2002/11/06 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Ian Jackson
• 2002/11/06 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Ian Jackson
• 2002/11/06 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Ian Jackson
• 2002/11/06 Bug#168122: project: alsa-xmms Torsten
• 2002/11/06 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Andrew Suffield
• 2002/11/06 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Adam Heath
• 2002/11/06 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Adam Heath
• 2002/11/06 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Ian Jackson
• 2002/11/06 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Ian Jackson
• 2002/11/06 All vi and clone to be removed from unstable Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/06 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Ian Jackson
• 2002/11/06 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Raul Miller
• 2002/11/06 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Andrew Suffield
• 2002/11/06 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Raul Miller
• 2002/11/06 diff between Ian Jackson's Disputes Draft 3 and Draft 4 Branden Robinson
• 2002/11/06 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Branden Robinson
• 2002/11/06 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Arto Jantunen
• 2002/11/06 Re: debian cd-image mirrors and US export restrictions Josip Rodin
• 2002/11/06 Re: debian cd-image mirrors and US export restrictions Harald K .
• 2002/11/06 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Andrew Suffield
• 2002/11/06 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Hamish Moffatt
• 2002/11/06 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Anthony Towns
• 2002/11/06 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/06 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Anthony Towns
• 2002/11/06 finding a consensus (was: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me) Andreas Schuldei
• 2002/11/05 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/05 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Branden Robinson
• 2002/11/05 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Branden Robinson
• 2002/11/05 Re: Disputes document - metaflameage Branden Robinson
• 2002/11/05 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Anthony Towns
• 2002/11/05 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Anthony Towns
• 2002/11/05 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/05 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/05 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Bdale Garbee
• 2002/11/05 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Adam Heath
• 2002/11/05 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/05 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Bdale Garbee
• 2002/11/05 Re: Disputes document - metaflameage Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/05 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/05 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Duncan Findlay
• 2002/11/05 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Duncan Findlay
• 2002/11/05 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/05 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/05 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Adam Heath
• 2002/11/05 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Adam Heath
• 2002/11/05 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Adam Heath
• 2002/11/05 Re: Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Chris Lawrence
• 2002/11/05 Re: debian cd-image mirrors and US export restrictions Peter Palfrader
• 2002/11/05 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Ian Jackson
• 2002/11/05 Disputes between developers - content, draft #4 Ian Jackson
• 2002/11/05 Disputes document - metaflameage Ian Jackson
• 2002/11/05 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Ian Jackson
• 2002/11/05 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Ian Jackson
• 2002/11/05 Re: debianHELP.org announcing commercial software? Chris Lawrence
• 2002/11/05 Re: debianHELP.org announcing commercial software? Ben Collins
• 2002/11/05 debianHELP.org announcing commercial software? Randy Edwards
• 2002/11/05 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Raul Miller
• 2002/11/05 Pour le temps des fêtes, doublez vos ventes ! tdinc
• 2002/11/05 Re: debian cd-image mirrors and US export restrictions Andrew Lau
• 2002/11/05 Re: Download Andrew Lau
• 2002/11/05 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Adam Heath
• 2002/11/04 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Anthony Towns
• 2002/11/04 (광고)도화지 닷컴 수채화 교실 !! newsletter
• 2002/11/04 [no subject] gerard
• 2002/11/04 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Duncan Findlay
• 2002/11/04 debian cd-image mirrors and US export restrictions Harald K .
• 2002/11/04 apt-get upgrade ..::jdb78::..
• 2002/11/04 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/04 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/04 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Manoj Srivastava
• 2002/11/04 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Branden Robinson
• 2002/11/04 Re: Microsoft's plans to kill open source: TCPA Dmitry Borodaenko
• 2002/11/04 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Matt Zimmerman
• 2002/11/04 Re: apt-get upgrade Jonas Smedegaard
• 2002/11/04 Re: apt-get upgrade Martijn van de Streek
• 2002/11/04 Re: apt-get upgrade Giacomo Catenazzi
• 2002/11/04 Re: apt-get upgrade Oliver Elphick
• 2002/11/04 Re: Microsoft's plans to kill open source: TCPA Andrew Suffield
• 2002/11/04 apt-get upgrade ..::jdb78::..
• 2002/11/04 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Anthony Towns
• 2002/11/03 Re: Microsoft's plans to kill open source: TCPA Anthony Towns
• 2002/11/03 Re: Microsoft's plans to kill open source: TCPA Scott Dier
• 2002/11/03 Re: Disputes between developers - draft guidelines Scott Dier
• 2002/11/03 Kit de marketing mais completo do mercado!! Alessandra - Fastmarketing
• 2002/11/03 Re: Microsoft's plans to kill open source: TCPA Branden Robinson
• 2002/11/03 Re: why Ian Jackson won't discuss the "disputes" document draft with me Branden Robinson
• 2002/11/03 Download Ger

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]